6-minute read
The Infrastructure That Will Define M&A's Next Decade
May 18, 2025
The Infrastructure No One Talks About
Every industry transformation has two phases:
Phase 1: Visible Innovation New products everyone can see. Faster tools. Prettier interfaces. Better user experiences. This is what gets written about, demoed at conferences, and featured in marketing materials.
Phase 2: Infrastructure Consolidation The invisible layer that actually determines who wins. Data standards. Network protocols. Integration ecosystems. Platform effects. This is what creates durable, defensible market positions.
M&A is entering Phase 2 right now, and most participants don't even realize it.
The firms that understand what's happening—and take strategic action in the next 18 months—will control M&A for the next two decades. Those that focus only on visible features will find themselves dependent on infrastructure controlled by competitors.
Let me show you what's really happening beneath the surface.
Infrastructure Layer 1: Data Standards
The Current Chaos
Right now, M&A data is completely unstandardized:
Every firm has different CIM templates
Financial statements come in infinite formats
Customer lists have no consistent schema
Due diligence checklists vary wildly by firm
Valuation models use different conventions
This seems normal because it's all we've ever known. But it's economically disastrous.
Every new deal requires full data translation. Buyer A expects data structured one way, Buyer B expects something completely different. The intermediary rebuilds the same information 15 times in 15 formats.
Compare this to other industries that solved standardization:
Real estate: MLS standardized property data, enabling Zillow, Redfin, automated valuation models
Securities: CUSIP/ISIN standardization enabled modern trading infrastructure
Logistics: Container standardization enabled global shipping as we know it
M&A is pre-standardization. The firms that establish the de facto standards will extract value from every transaction forever.
What's Being Built Right Now
At Flagpost, we're not just building tools—we're establishing the data standards that will define M&A:
Company Brain Schema: A comprehensive graph structure that captures:
Entity taxonomy (customers, suppliers, employees, assets, liabilities)
Relationship types (contracts, dependencies, ownership, control)
Metric definitions (revenue, EBITDA, ARR, CAC, LTV, working capital)
Temporal versioning (how metrics evolve over time)
Evidence lineage (every claim links to supporting documents)
Every deal processed through Flagpost reinforces these standards. When you've processed 1,000 deals with the same schema, that schema becomes the industry standard—not through mandate, but through network effects.
Why This Matters to You
If your data is already in the dominant standard format:
Buyers can analyze it instantly (no translation delay)
Comparable company analysis becomes automated
Your deals move faster because they're "ready to integrate"
You attract more buyer attention because evaluation friction is lower
If your data isn't in the standard format:
Every deal requires costly translation
You're slower to market than competitors
Buyers perceive your deals as "more work"
You gradually lose market access
Infrastructure advantages compound. Early adopters of winning standards capture disproportionate value forever.
Infrastructure Layer 2: Network Effects
The Marketplace That's Forming
Right now, M&A deal flow is inefficient:
Sellers find intermediaries through referrals and reputation
Intermediaries find buyers through personal networks
Buyers source deals through proprietary outreach and intermediary relationships
This works, but it's friction-heavy and relationship-dependent. What happens when someone retires? When a key relationship sours? When a competitor offers a better split?
The future of M&A is platform-mediated deal flow with powerful network effects:
For Sellers: The platform with the most qualified buyers gets the best sellers (who want competitive tension and optimal valuations)
For Buyers: The platform with the most quality deal flow gets the most buyers (who want efficient sourcing and first-look opportunities)
For Intermediaries: The platform that connects them to both sides most efficiently becomes indispensable
This isn't speculation—we're watching it happen:
Flagpost customers are already sharing anonymized company profiles: "SaaS, $5M ARR, 40% EBITDA margins, Midwest—interested?"
Buyers are setting search parameters: "Alert me when a company matching these criteria appears"
Sellers are choosing intermediaries partially based on buyer network access
Within 36 months, a significant percentage of middle-market deals will originate through platform-mediated matching, not personal network outreach.
The Winner-Take-Most Dynamic
Network effects create winner-take-most markets:
In ride-sharing: Uber captured 70%+ market share because more riders → more drivers → more riders
In professional networking: LinkedIn has 90%+ share because everyone you want to connect with is already there
In M&A platforms: the system with 10,000 deals will beat the system with 1,000 deals, which will beat the system with 100 deals
The quality of matching, the depth of comparable data, the liquidity of the marketplace—all improve dramatically with scale.
First-mover advantage is real. The platform that reaches critical mass first (roughly 1,000+ deals in system) becomes very difficult to displace.
Why Flagpost Is Building This Now
Every deal processed through Flagpost adds to the network:
More sellers → better buyer matching → attracts more buyers
More buyers → better price discovery → attracts more sellers
More deals → better benchmarking data → better valuations → attracts both sides
We're not just building software for individual deals—we're building the marketplace infrastructure that will intermediate billions in transaction value.
Early participants benefit from the network before it's saturated. Late participants face established competition with unassailable advantages.
Infrastructure Layer 3: Integration Ecosystem
The Platform Strategy
No single company can build every feature M&A participants need. The winners will be platforms with rich integration ecosystems, not monoliths trying to do everything.
Think about:
Salesforce: Doesn't do everything; AppExchange has 3,000+ integrations
Shopify: Doesn't build all e-commerce features; App Store has 8,000+ plugins
Stripe: Doesn't handle all payment needs; extensive partner network
The M&A platform that becomes the integration hub—connecting data rooms, legal tools, accounting systems, tax advisors, lenders, insurance providers—controls the ecosystem.
What Flagpost Is Building
We're designing for an ecosystem from Day 1:
Current Integrations:
QuickBooks, NetSuite, Xero (automated financial data import)
DocuSign, PandaDoc (signature workflows)
Datasite, Intralinks (data room sync)
Common CRM systems (deal pipeline management)
Upcoming Integration Framework:
Public API for third-party developers
Webhook system for real-time data sync
OAuth for secure authentication across platforms
Standardized data export formats
Strategic Partnership Model:
Legal tech platforms (contract analysis, due diligence automation)
Accounting firms (QoE automation, tax structure optimization)
Lenders (SBA loan processing, asset-based lending decisioning)
Insurance (reps & warranties insurance automation)
The goal: Flagpost becomes the central data and workflow hub that every other M&A service provider integrates with.
Why This Creates Defensibility
Once an ecosystem forms around your platform:
Switching costs explode: Moving to a competitor means re-integrating everything
Network effects strengthen: More integrations → more valuable to users → more users → more integration partners want in
Data moat deepens: Every connected system feeds more data into your intelligence layer
Innovation accelerates: Third parties build features you didn't have to
Platform winners don't just have better products—they have ecosystems that compound advantages faster than competitors can match.
Infrastructure Layer 4: Trust Architecture
The Underrated Foundation
M&A involves extraordinary trust requirements:
Sellers share confidential financial data
Buyers share acquisition criteria and valuation models
Intermediaries manage fiduciary responsibilities
Everyone needs to know sensitive information stays secure
Traditional M&A handled this through personal relationships and legal agreements. AI-native M&A requires technical trust infrastructure:
What We're Building:
Provenance Tracking:
Every data point has complete lineage
Audit logs show who accessed what when
Version history tracks all changes
Citation links prove every claim
Role-Based Access Controls:
Granular permissions (this buyer sees financials but not customer names)
Time-limited access (expires after 90 days)
Watermarking and tracking for sensitive documents
Automatic redaction of PII where appropriate
Compliance by Design:
SOC 2 Type II certified infrastructure
GDPR and CCPA compliant data handling
Encryption at rest and in transit
Geographic data residency options
Transparent AI:
Explainable outputs (show your work)
Human-in-the-loop for material decisions
Clear labeling of AI-generated vs. human-created content
Confidence scoring on automated analyses
Trust infrastructure isn't sexy, but it's foundational. The platforms that get this right enable participants to transact with confidence. Those that don't remain niche tools that can't handle sensitive deals.
The Strategic Imperative: Build on Winning Infrastructure
Within 18-24 months, the M&A infrastructure landscape will be substantially locked in:
Data standards will be established (whoever processes the most deals defines them)
Network effects will reach tipping points (liquidity begets more liquidity)
Integration ecosystems will crystallize (developers build for the largest platforms)
Trust architectures will be proven (participants gravitate to demonstrated security)
The firms building on winning infrastructure now will have compounding advantages. Those that wait will face:
Data translation costs forever
Network disadvantages that widen over time
Integration gaps that slow their workflows
Trust deficits that limit deal size and sensitivity
Flagpost Is Building the Infrastructure, Not Just the Tools
We're not just making M&A slightly more efficient. We're building the foundational infrastructure that will enable the next generation of M&A innovation:
Automated valuation models that actually work (enabled by standardized data)
Real-time matching between buyers and sellers (enabled by network effects)
Seamless workflow across all M&A service providers (enabled by integration ecosystem)
AI-powered diligence and closing (enabled by trust architecture)
This infrastructure takes years to build properly and billions of dollars of transaction volume to validate. But once established, it's nearly impossible to displace.
The question for M&A professionals: Will you build on infrastructure that's proven and growing, or infrastructure that's proprietary and isolated?
The firms making the right choice now will thrive for decades. Those that mistake visible features for durable infrastructure will find themselves increasingly marginalized—dependent on platforms controlled by competitors who moved faster.
